Selling Pressure on AI Infrastructure Stocks May Not Be Over: JP Morgan Warns That Retail Investors' Willingness to Buy the Dip Is Insufficient, and the Retreat of Buyback Funds Is Intensifying Market Risks

date
22:22 15/10/2026
avatar
GMT Eight
JPMorgan warned in its latest report that although AI infrastructure-related stocks have recently seen a notable pullback, the current market environment is more unfavorable compared with the correction in late July this year.
JPMorgan warned in its latest "Flows & Liquidity" report released on October 14 that although AI infrastructure-related stocks have recently seen a notable pullback, the current market environment is more unfavorable compared with the correction in late July this year. Factors such as retail investors' lack of willingness to actively buy the dip, the impending end of corporate share buybacks, low short positioning, and the relatively high scale of leveraged ETFs may cause AI-related stocks to continue facing downward pressure. JPMorgan's strategy team led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou pointed out that the recent correction in AI infrastructure stocks was mainly led by South Korean memory chip companies, with a trajectory quite similar to the late-July pullback this year. However, there are clear differences in the fund flows and market positioning structure behind the two rounds of adjustment. First, retail investors' willingness to buy the dip has weakened markedly. JPMorgan noted that during the South Korean stock market decline in July this year, investors actively bought South Korean equities through both leveraged and non-leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs), providing support for the subsequent market rebound. By contrast, since the start of October, buying in South Korean equity ETFs has been relatively limited. Although some overseas investors increased exposure through leveraged ETFs and domestic investors also bought some non-leveraged ETFs, overall there has not yet been the same obvious dip-buying behavior as in July. It is worth noting that although global equity funds as a whole still maintained net inflows, these funds did not clearly dip-buying demand for AI infrastructure stocks. Second, the current market lacks sufficient short-covering momentum. The report noted that in July this year, the shares outstanding of the U.S.-listed South Korea equity ETF, iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY.US), once grew by about 30%, but a considerable portion of that increase was related to an increase in short positions. As the market subsequently stabilized, short covering became an important force driving the rebound in South Korean equities in August. However, since the start of October this year, EWY's short positioning has changed little, meaning the current market lacks similar short-covering demand from before and cannot rely on concentrated short unwinding to drive a rapid rebound in share prices. This phenomenon also appears in U.S. memory chip and semiconductor-related assets. JPMorgan pointed out that short positioning in U.S. memory-related stocks such as Micron Technology, Inc. (MU.US), SanDisk (SNDK.US), Western Digital Corporation (WDC.US), and Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (STX.US) is at relatively low levels, while short positioning in the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH.US) and the Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM.US) is likewise not high. At the same time, short positioning in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY.US), which tracks the S&P 500 Index, also remains at a low level. JPMorgan believes that insufficient short positioning means that once the market stabilizes, the additional buying that can be generated through short covering is relatively limited, which is also a potential vulnerability currently facing the stock market. Third, the scale of leveraged ETFs has expanded compared with late July, which may intensify market volatility. The report showed that after bottoming in late July this year, the ratio of leveraged equity ETF assets under management to the total market capitalization of underlying stocks rose again in August and September. At present, this ratio has recovered to about 70% of the way between this year's April low and June high, indicating that the relative scale of leveraged ETFs is clearly higher than at the end of July. JPMorgan pointed out that this change makes the current market more susceptible to leveraged funds adjusting positions. When stock prices continue to fall, rebalancing trades by leveraged ETFs to maintain target leverage levels may further amplify short-term market volatility. Fourth, buyback support from large South Korean memory chip companies is about to weaken. The report noted that two large South Korean memory chip companies previously announced a share buyback program totaling about $40 billion, effective from August 20, 2026. These buybacks were originally scheduled to continue until November, but due to faster execution progress, they are expected to be completed ahead of schedule in mid-October. This means that an important source of buying support for the relevant stocks over the past period is about to disappear. The bank emphasized that at the time of the market correction in late July this year, there was no similar sudden retreat in buyback funds, so the technical environment currently facing AI infrastructure stocks is more unfavorable. Taken together, JPMorgan believes that insufficient retail dip-buying demand, a lack of room for large-scale short covering, relatively high leveraged ETF exposure, and the imminent reduction in corporate buyback funds make the short-term risks for AI infrastructure stocks higher now than at the end of July. However, the bank also noted that although there is fragility in short-term funding conditions and positioning structure, over the medium to long term, the fundamentals of AI and the technology sector are still expected to provide support, so short-term market adjustments should not be equated with a reversal in the industry's long-term growth logic. In addition to AI-related stocks, JPMorgan also issued a warning on the outlook for U.S. cyclical stocks, arguing that the recent pullback has not yet pushed them into clearly oversold territory. The report noted that over the past one to two months, the Russell 2000 Index and cyclical sectors have continued to underperform the broader market, triggering concerns about a U.S. economic slowdown and recession risk. According to JPMorgan's estimates as of October 12, the recession probability implied by Russell 2000 Index prices is about 28%, while the recession probability implied by the performance of cyclical sectors relative to defensive sectors is about 32%. By comparison, the recession probability implied by the S&P 500 Index is only about 1%, and the recession risk reflected in the U.S. investment-grade credit, high-yield bond, and U.S. Treasury markets is also relatively limited. This indicates that concerns about an economic slowdown are mainly concentrated in small-cap stocks and traditional cyclical industries and have not yet been fully reflected in the pricing of large-cap stocks and other major asset classes. The bank further analyzed that although positioning in cyclical sectors relative to defensive sectors has declined since mid-August, it has not yet shifted overall into a short allocation. At the same time, fund flows into cyclical sector ETFs have gradually weakened relative to defensive sectors since mid-2026, and this trend has shown signs of accelerating in recent weeks. However, whether judged by investor positioning, fund flows, or relative share price performance, cyclical stocks have not yet reached clearly oversold levels. JPMorgan believes this means cyclical stocks remain in a relatively difficult phase, and subsequent downside risks should not be ignored. The bank pointed out that for cyclical stocks to achieve a sustained rebound and for the U.S. equity rally to broaden from a handful of technology giants to a wider range of industries, multiple conditions may need to improve simultaneously, including lower bond yields, strong corporate earnings, and a gradual fading of signs of labor market weakness. At the same time, however, economic improvement must not further drive up inflation, so as not to force the Federal Reserve to adopt more aggressive rate hikes.